← Browse entries

cpna-3

C. elegans

VWFA domain-containing protein

What the model saw

Gene: cpna-3
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: VWFA domain-containing protein. calcium-dependent phospholipid binding.
View unredacted entry
VWFA domain-containing protein. calcium-dependent phospholipid binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
30%
Mechanism
Unclear
Reasoning

cpna-3 encodes a VWFA (von Willebrand Factor A) domain-containing protein with calcium-dependent phospholipid binding activity. VWFA domains are typically involved in protein-protein interactions and extracellular matrix adhesion, while calcium-dependent phospholipid binding is characteristic of annexin-like proteins involved in membrane dynamics and signaling. Neither function maps cleanly to a well-established pro- or anti-longevity pathway in C. elegans. Calcium signaling can intersect with multiple aging hallmarks (mitochondrial function, proteostasis, intercellular communication), but the specific molecular role of cpna-3 in any longevity-relevant pathway is not well-defined by these annotations alone. Without evidence linking this gene to insulin/IGF-1, TOR, mitochondrial, or other canonical aging pathways in C. elegans, a directional prediction cannot be confidently made.

Key pathways
calcium-dependent phospholipid bindingVWFA domain-mediated protein interactionsmembrane dynamics
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" with low confidence (0.3), while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model's reasoning is plausible given the limited functional information provided (VWFA domain, calcium-dependent phospholipid binding), but it failed to make a directional prediction. The model correctly identified that these functions don't map cleanly to canonical longevity pathways, but this is a case where the model should have attempted a directional guess rather than defaulting to "unclear." The mechanistic reasoning is generic and doesn't identify any specific anti-longevity mechanism. The model's uncertainty is somewhat appropriate given the sparse annotation, but the ground truth is definitively anti_longevity, making this a missed prediction.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "cpna-3 encodes a VWFA (von Willebrand Factor A) domain-containing protein with calcium-dependent phospholipid binding activity. VWFA domains are typically involved in protein-protein interactions and extracellular matrix adhesion, while calcium-dependent phospholipid binding is characteristic of annexin-like proteins involved in membrane dynamics and signaling. Neither function maps cleanly to a well-established pro- or anti-longevity pathway in C. elegans. Calcium signaling can intersect with multiple aging hallmarks (mitochondrial function, proteostasis, intercellular communication), but the specific molecular role of cpna-3 in any longevity-relevant pathway is not well-defined by these annotations alone. Without evidence linking this gene to insulin/IGF-1, TOR, mitochondrial, or other canonical aging pathways in C. elegans, a directional prediction cannot be confidently made.",
  "confidence": 0.3,
  "key_pathways": [
    "calcium-dependent phospholipid binding",
    "VWFA domain-mediated protein interactions",
    "membrane dynamics"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "unclear",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" with low confidence (0.3), while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model's reasoning is plausible given the limited functional information provided (VWFA domain, calcium-dependent phospholipid binding), but it failed to make a directional prediction. The model correctly identified that these functions don't map cleanly to canonical longevity pathways, but this is a case where the model should have attempted a directional guess rather than defaulting to \"unclear.\" The mechanistic reasoning is generic and doesn't identify any specific anti-longevity mechanism. The model's uncertainty is somewhat appropriate given the sparse annotation, but the ground truth is definitively anti_longevity, making this a missed prediction.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}