← Browse entries

crol

D. melanogaster

crooked legs

What the model saw

Gene: crol
Organism: Drosophila melanogaster
Known functions: crooked legs. DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific. RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding.
View unredacted entry
crooked legs. DNA-binding transcription factor activity, RNA polymerase II-specific. RNA polymerase II cis-regulatory region sequence-specific DNA binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Epigenetic alterations
Reasoning

The crol gene encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor (crooked legs) that binds cis-regulatory regions and modulates RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. While transcription factor activity can influence longevity pathways (e.g., by regulating stress response, insulin/IGF-1 signaling, or metabolic genes), the known molecular function annotations for crol are limited to general DNA-binding and transcriptional regulation without specifying which downstream targets or pathways are controlled. Without knowledge of the specific gene network crol regulates, it is not possible to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role. The mechanism most plausibly maps to epigenetic/transcriptional alterations, a hallmark of aging, but the directionality remains ambiguous.

Key pathways
RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulationcis-regulatory element bindingtranscription factor network
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is "anti_longevity". The model correctly identified crol as a transcription factor but failed to assign a directionality. The reasoning is plausible given the limited information provided in the entry, but the model was unable to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanism classification as "epigenetic_alterations" is somewhat off - crol is a transcription factor, not strictly an epigenetic regulator. The model's uncertainty is understandable given the sparse functional annotations provided, but it still missed the correct answer.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "The crol gene encodes a zinc-finger transcription factor (crooked legs) that binds cis-regulatory regions and modulates RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. While transcription factor activity can influence longevity pathways (e.g., by regulating stress response, insulin/IGF-1 signaling, or metabolic genes), the known molecular function annotations for crol are limited to general DNA-binding and transcriptional regulation without specifying which downstream targets or pathways are controlled. Without knowledge of the specific gene network crol regulates, it is not possible to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role. The mechanism most plausibly maps to epigenetic/transcriptional alterations, a hallmark of aging, but the directionality remains ambiguous.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "RNA polymerase II transcriptional regulation",
    "cis-regulatory element binding",
    "transcription factor network"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "epigenetic_alterations",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity\". The model correctly identified crol as a transcription factor but failed to assign a directionality. The reasoning is plausible given the limited information provided in the entry, but the model was unable to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanism classification as \"epigenetic_alterations\" is somewhat off - crol is a transcription factor, not strictly an epigenetic regulator. The model's uncertainty is understandable given the sparse functional annotations provided, but it still missed the correct answer.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}