← Browse entries

inx-9

C. elegans

Innexin

What the model saw

Gene: inx-9
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: Innexin. gap junction channel activity.
View unredacted entry
Innexin. gap junction channel activity.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Altered intercellular communication
Reasoning

INX-9 is a C. elegans innexin, the invertebrate homolog of vertebrate connexins/pannexins, and forms gap junction channels that mediate direct intercellular communication by allowing passage of small molecules, ions, and signaling metabolites between cells. Gap junctions are central to altered intercellular communication, a hallmark of aging, but the directionality of their effect on longevity is highly context-dependent: some innexins (e.g., inx-14, inx-21) have been linked to germline signaling and reproductive aging, while others modulate neuronal or somatic tissue coupling. Without specific knowledge of which tissues inx-9 is expressed in, which molecular cargo it passes, or whether its loss extends or shortens lifespan, the net effect on longevity cannot be confidently assigned. The molecular function annotation alone (gap junction channel activity) does not distinguish pro- from anti-longevity roles among the large innexin family in C. elegans.

Key pathways
gap junction intercellular communicationinnexin channel signalingaltered intercellular communication
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
3/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model's reasoning is sound in acknowledging that gap junction directionality is context-dependent and that the minimal annotation doesn't allow confident assignment. However, the model failed to commit to the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about innexins and intercellular communication is generally reasonable but doesn't arrive at the correct conclusion. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than confident wrongness, but the answer is still incorrect.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "INX-9 is a C. elegans innexin, the invertebrate homolog of vertebrate connexins/pannexins, and forms gap junction channels that mediate direct intercellular communication by allowing passage of small molecules, ions, and signaling metabolites between cells. Gap junctions are central to altered intercellular communication, a hallmark of aging, but the directionality of their effect on longevity is highly context-dependent: some innexins (e.g., inx-14, inx-21) have been linked to germline signaling and reproductive aging, while others modulate neuronal or somatic tissue coupling. Without specific knowledge of which tissues inx-9 is expressed in, which molecular cargo it passes, or whether its loss extends or shortens lifespan, the net effect on longevity cannot be confidently assigned. The molecular function annotation alone (gap junction channel activity) does not distinguish pro- from anti-longevity roles among the large innexin family in C. elegans.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "gap junction intercellular communication",
    "innexin channel signaling",
    "altered intercellular communication"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "altered_intercellular_communication",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model's reasoning is sound in acknowledging that gap junction directionality is context-dependent and that the minimal annotation doesn't allow confident assignment. However, the model failed to commit to the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about innexins and intercellular communication is generally reasonable but doesn't arrive at the correct conclusion. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than confident wrongness, but the answer is still incorrect.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 3,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}