← Browse entries

t25b9.1

C. elegans

Aminotransferase class I/classII large domain-containing protein

What the model saw

Gene: T25B9.1
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: Aminotransferase class I/classII large domain-containing protein. glycine C-acetyltransferase activity. pyridoxal phosphate binding.
View unredacted entry
Aminotransferase class I/classII large domain-containing protein. glycine C-acetyltransferase activity. pyridoxal phosphate binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
38%
Mechanism
Deregulated nutrient sensing
Reasoning

T25B9.1 encodes a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent aminotransferase with glycine C-acetyltransferase activity, catalyzing the condensation of glycine with acetyl-CoA to produce 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate, a step in threonine catabolism and one-carbon/amino acid metabolism. While glycine metabolism has been linked to longevity (glycine supplementation extends lifespan in some models), the specific enzymatic step here—glycine C-acetyltransferase—consumes glycine rather than producing it, which could theoretically reduce glycine availability and oppose pro-longevity glycine signaling. However, this reaction also feeds into central metabolic pathways (acetyl-CoA utilization, amino acid homeostasis) whose net effect on aging in C. elegans is not clearly established. The PLP-binding aminotransferase class I/II domain suggests broad substrate flexibility, making it difficult to assign a definitive pro- or anti-longevity role without direct lifespan data.

Key pathways
glycine metabolism / one-carbon metabolismthreonine catabolism via glycine C-acetyltransferasepyridoxal phosphate-dependent amino acid metabolism
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model's confidence was low (0.38), and it acknowledged uncertainty, but it still failed to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about glycine C-acetyltransferase consuming glycine and potentially opposing pro-longevity glycine signaling is speculative and not well-supported. The model did not identify the anti-longevity role of this gene. While the model's uncertainty is somewhat appropriate given limited direct evidence, it still missed the correct classification entirely.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "T25B9.1 encodes a pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent aminotransferase with glycine C-acetyltransferase activity, catalyzing the condensation of glycine with acetyl-CoA to produce 2-amino-3-ketobutyrate, a step in threonine catabolism and one-carbon/amino acid metabolism. While glycine metabolism has been linked to longevity (glycine supplementation extends lifespan in some models), the specific enzymatic step here—glycine C-acetyltransferase—consumes glycine rather than producing it, which could theoretically reduce glycine availability and oppose pro-longevity glycine signaling. However, this reaction also feeds into central metabolic pathways (acetyl-CoA utilization, amino acid homeostasis) whose net effect on aging in C. elegans is not clearly established. The PLP-binding aminotransferase class I/II domain suggests broad substrate flexibility, making it difficult to assign a definitive pro- or anti-longevity role without direct lifespan data.",
  "confidence": 0.38,
  "key_pathways": [
    "glycine metabolism / one-carbon metabolism",
    "threonine catabolism via glycine C-acetyltransferase",
    "pyridoxal phosphate-dependent amino acid metabolism"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "deregulated_nutrient_sensing",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model's confidence was low (0.38), and it acknowledged uncertainty, but it still failed to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about glycine C-acetyltransferase consuming glycine and potentially opposing pro-longevity glycine signaling is speculative and not well-supported. The model did not identify the anti-longevity role of this gene. While the model's uncertainty is somewhat appropriate given limited direct evidence, it still missed the correct classification entirely.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}