← Browse entries

y43c5a.3

C. elegans

FIP (Fungus-Induced Protein) Related

What the model saw

Gene: Y43C5A.3
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: FIP (Fungus-Induced Protein) Related. double-stranded DNA binding.
View unredacted entry
FIP (Fungus-Induced Protein) Related. double-stranded DNA binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Genomic instability
Reasoning

Y43C5A.3 is annotated as a FIP (Fungus-Induced Protein) related protein with double-stranded DNA binding activity. dsDNA binding proteins can participate in DNA repair, replication, transcription regulation, or innate immune sensing, all of which have distinct and sometimes opposing effects on longevity. The FIP-related family in C. elegans is not well characterized in the context of aging, making it difficult to assign a directional effect. While dsDNA binding is broadly consistent with a role in maintaining genomic integrity (a pro-longevity function), the FIP-related annotation suggests possible roles in stress or immune responses that could be either beneficial or detrimental. Without more specific pathway information—such as whether this protein acts in homologous recombination, nucleotide excision repair, or innate immune signaling—a confident directional prediction cannot be made.

Key pathways
double-stranded DNA binding / genomic integrityFIP-related stress responseinnate immune / pathogen response signaling
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model was appropriately uncertain given the limited information available about Y43C5A.3, but it still got the answer wrong. The model's reasoning about dsDNA binding proteins potentially having pro-longevity roles through genomic integrity maintenance actually leans slightly in the wrong direction from the ground truth (anti_longevity). The model correctly identified the ambiguity but failed to commit to a directional prediction. With only 0.35 confidence and an "unclear" classification, this is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than a confident wrong answer, but the prediction is still incorrect relative to the ground truth.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "Y43C5A.3 is annotated as a FIP (Fungus-Induced Protein) related protein with double-stranded DNA binding activity. dsDNA binding proteins can participate in DNA repair, replication, transcription regulation, or innate immune sensing, all of which have distinct and sometimes opposing effects on longevity. The FIP-related family in C. elegans is not well characterized in the context of aging, making it difficult to assign a directional effect. While dsDNA binding is broadly consistent with a role in maintaining genomic integrity (a pro-longevity function), the FIP-related annotation suggests possible roles in stress or immune responses that could be either beneficial or detrimental. Without more specific pathway information—such as whether this protein acts in homologous recombination, nucleotide excision repair, or innate immune signaling—a confident directional prediction cannot be made.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "double-stranded DNA binding / genomic integrity",
    "FIP-related stress response",
    "innate immune / pathogen response signaling"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "genomic_instability",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model was appropriately uncertain given the limited information available about Y43C5A.3, but it still got the answer wrong. The model's reasoning about dsDNA binding proteins potentially having pro-longevity roles through genomic integrity maintenance actually leans slightly in the wrong direction from the ground truth (anti_longevity). The model correctly identified the ambiguity but failed to commit to a directional prediction. With only 0.35 confidence and an \"unclear\" classification, this is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than a confident wrong answer, but the prediction is still incorrect relative to the ground truth.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}