← Browse entries

numr-2

C. elegans

PB1 domain-containing protein

What the model saw

Gene: numr-2
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: PB1 domain-containing protein. protein binding.
View unredacted entry
PB1 domain-containing protein. protein binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Unclear
Reasoning

numr-2 encodes a PB1 (Phox and Bem1) domain-containing protein in C. elegans, with the only annotated molecular function being generic protein binding. PB1 domains mediate protein-protein interactions and are found in diverse signaling scaffolds, including those involved in oxidative stress responses and NF-κB-like pathways; however, the specific binding partners and downstream pathway context for numr-2 are not discernible from these annotations alone. The gene name "numr" (nuclear localized metal-responsive) suggests possible involvement in metal ion stress responses, but this is not captured in the provided GO terms. Without knowing which complex numr-2 scaffolds or which signaling axis it modulates, it is not possible to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role.

Key pathways
PB1 domain-mediated protein-protein interactionstress response signaling scaffoldingmetal-responsive nuclear signaling
Longevity influence
Pro-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" while the ground truth is "pro_longevity." The model's reasoning is somewhat reasonable given the sparse annotations provided (PB1 domain, protein binding), but it missed that the "numr" gene name stands for "nuclear localized metal-responsive" and that numr-1/numr-2 paralogs in C. elegans have been studied in the context of metal stress and longevity. The model did mention the "nuclear localized metal-responsive" interpretation but didn't commit to a direction. The confidence was appropriately low (0.35), making this an "appropriately uncertain" failure rather than a confident wrong answer. The mechanistic reasoning about PB1 domains and stress response scaffolding is plausible but not specifically correct for numr-2's pro-longevity role.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "numr-2 encodes a PB1 (Phox and Bem1) domain-containing protein in C. elegans, with the only annotated molecular function being generic protein binding. PB1 domains mediate protein-protein interactions and are found in diverse signaling scaffolds, including those involved in oxidative stress responses and NF-κB-like pathways; however, the specific binding partners and downstream pathway context for numr-2 are not discernible from these annotations alone. The gene name \"numr\" (nuclear localized metal-responsive) suggests possible involvement in metal ion stress responses, but this is not captured in the provided GO terms. Without knowing which complex numr-2 scaffolds or which signaling axis it modulates, it is not possible to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "PB1 domain-mediated protein-protein interaction",
    "stress response signaling scaffolding",
    "metal-responsive nuclear signaling"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "unclear",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" while the ground truth is \"pro_longevity.\" The model's reasoning is somewhat reasonable given the sparse annotations provided (PB1 domain, protein binding), but it missed that the \"numr\" gene name stands for \"nuclear localized metal-responsive\" and that numr-1/numr-2 paralogs in C. elegans have been studied in the context of metal stress and longevity. The model did mention the \"nuclear localized metal-responsive\" interpretation but didn't commit to a direction. The confidence was appropriately low (0.35), making this an \"appropriately uncertain\" failure rather than a confident wrong answer. The mechanistic reasoning about PB1 domains and stress response scaffolding is plausible but not specifically correct for numr-2's pro-longevity role.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}