← Browse entries

rbm-39

C. elegans

RRM domain-containing protein

What the model saw

Gene: rbm-39
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: RRM domain-containing protein. RNA binding. chromatin DNA binding. nucleic acid binding.
View unredacted entry
RRM domain-containing protein. RNA binding. chromatin DNA binding. nucleic acid binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Epigenetic alterations
Reasoning

RBM-39 is an RRM (RNA Recognition Motif) domain-containing protein with RNA binding and chromatin DNA binding activities, suggesting roles in both pre-mRNA splicing/processing and transcriptional regulation. In mammals, RBM39 is a splicing factor and transcriptional co-activator involved in alternative splicing regulation. While splicing fidelity is important for proteostasis and genome integrity, the dual chromatin and RNA binding functions make it difficult to assign a clear pro- or anti-longevity role without direct experimental evidence in C. elegans. The gene could influence longevity through epigenetic/transcriptional regulation or RNA processing, but these functions are broad and do not map cleanly to a single aging hallmark with a defined directionality.

Key pathways
pre-mRNA splicing and alternative splicingchromatin-associated transcriptional regulationRNA processing and nucleic acid binding
Longevity influence
Pro-longevity
Lifespan effect
Decrease

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" while the ground truth is "pro_longevity." The model's reasoning is plausible but overly cautious — it correctly identifies RBM-39's RNA binding and chromatin functions but fails to commit to a direction. The model's confidence of 0.35 reflects genuine uncertainty, making this an "appropriately uncertain" failure rather than a confident wrong answer. The mechanistic reasoning about splicing and transcriptional regulation is reasonable but not specifically tied to the pro-longevity finding in C. elegans. The model did not identify any specific experimental evidence linking rbm-39 to longevity in C. elegans, which would have been necessary to arrive at the correct answer.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "RBM-39 is an RRM (RNA Recognition Motif) domain-containing protein with RNA binding and chromatin DNA binding activities, suggesting roles in both pre-mRNA splicing/processing and transcriptional regulation. In mammals, RBM39 is a splicing factor and transcriptional co-activator involved in alternative splicing regulation. While splicing fidelity is important for proteostasis and genome integrity, the dual chromatin and RNA binding functions make it difficult to assign a clear pro- or anti-longevity role without direct experimental evidence in C. elegans. The gene could influence longevity through epigenetic/transcriptional regulation or RNA processing, but these functions are broad and do not map cleanly to a single aging hallmark with a defined directionality.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "pre-mRNA splicing and alternative splicing",
    "chromatin-associated transcriptional regulation",
    "RNA processing and nucleic acid binding"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "epigenetic_alterations",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" while the ground truth is \"pro_longevity.\" The model's reasoning is plausible but overly cautious — it correctly identifies RBM-39's RNA binding and chromatin functions but fails to commit to a direction. The model's confidence of 0.35 reflects genuine uncertainty, making this an \"appropriately uncertain\" failure rather than a confident wrong answer. The mechanistic reasoning about splicing and transcriptional regulation is reasonable but not specifically tied to the pro-longevity finding in C. elegans. The model did not identify any specific experimental evidence linking rbm-39 to longevity in C. elegans, which would have been necessary to arrive at the correct answer.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}
rbm-39 · Caenorhabditis elegans | Aging biology eval