← Browse entries

lsm-7

C. elegans

U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm7

What the model saw

Gene: lsm-7
Organism: Caenorhabditis elegans
Known functions: U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm7. RNA binding. protein binding.
View unredacted entry
U6 snRNA-associated Sm-like protein LSm7. RNA binding. protein binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Pro-longevity
Confidence
55%
Mechanism
Epigenetic alterations
Reasoning

LSm7 is a core component of the LSm2-8 complex that associates with U6 snRNA and is essential for pre-mRNA splicing via the spliceosome. Accurate pre-mRNA splicing is required for proper gene expression and proteome integrity; disruption of splicing fidelity is increasingly linked to aging phenotypes in C. elegans and other organisms. Additionally, LSm proteins participate in mRNA decay and RNA processing pathways that regulate stress-response and longevity-related transcripts. Maintenance of RNA processing fidelity through the LSm complex supports the broader category of epigenetic/transcriptional regulation that underpins healthy aging. Loss of splicing regulators in C. elegans has been shown to shorten lifespan, suggesting the normal function of lsm-7 is pro-longevity.

Key pathways
U6 snRNA/spliceosome assemblypre-mRNA splicing fidelitymRNA decay and RNA processing
Longevity influence
Pro-longevity
Lifespan effect
Decrease

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Correct
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
3/5
Failure mode
Right answer, wrong reasoning
Notes

The model correctly predicted pro_longevity for lsm-7. However, the mechanism classification as "epigenetic_alterations" is questionable — RNA splicing/processing is not typically classified as epigenetic. The reasoning about splicing fidelity and RNA processing is plausible but somewhat generic, and the model doesn't cite specific experimental evidence for lsm-7's role in C. elegans longevity. The confidence of 0.55 is appropriately modest. The core logic (loss of splicing regulators shortens lifespan → lsm-7 is pro-longevity) is reasonable but not strongly supported by specific mechanistic evidence. The mechanism class "epigenetic_alterations" is a misclassification for what is fundamentally an RNA processing/splicing function.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "LSm7 is a core component of the LSm2-8 complex that associates with U6 snRNA and is essential for pre-mRNA splicing via the spliceosome. Accurate pre-mRNA splicing is required for proper gene expression and proteome integrity; disruption of splicing fidelity is increasingly linked to aging phenotypes in C. elegans and other organisms. Additionally, LSm proteins participate in mRNA decay and RNA processing pathways that regulate stress-response and longevity-related transcripts. Maintenance of RNA processing fidelity through the LSm complex supports the broader category of epigenetic/transcriptional regulation that underpins healthy aging. Loss of splicing regulators in C. elegans has been shown to shorten lifespan, suggesting the normal function of lsm-7 is pro-longevity.",
  "confidence": 0.55,
  "key_pathways": [
    "U6 snRNA/spliceosome assembly",
    "pre-mRNA splicing fidelity",
    "mRNA decay and RNA processing"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "epigenetic_alterations",
  "longevity_influence": "pro_longevity"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model correctly predicted pro_longevity for lsm-7. However, the mechanism classification as \"epigenetic_alterations\" is questionable — RNA splicing/processing is not typically classified as epigenetic. The reasoning about splicing fidelity and RNA processing is plausible but somewhat generic, and the model doesn't cite specific experimental evidence for lsm-7's role in C. elegans longevity. The confidence of 0.55 is appropriately modest. The core logic (loss of splicing regulators shortens lifespan → lsm-7 is pro-longevity) is reasonable but not strongly supported by specific mechanistic evidence. The mechanism class \"epigenetic_alterations\" is a misclassification for what is fundamentally an RNA processing/splicing function.",
  "failure_mode": "right_answer_wrong_reasoning",
  "answer_correct": true,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 3,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}