← Browse entries

duc1

S. pombe

protein duc1

What the model saw

Gene: duc1
Organism: Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Known functions: protein duc1. phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding. phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate sensor activity. protein binding.
View unredacted entry
protein duc1. phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate binding. phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate sensor activity. protein binding.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Unclear
Reasoning

duc1 encodes a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) binding and sensor protein in S. pombe. PI(4,5)P2 is a key signaling lipid involved in membrane dynamics, cytoskeletal organization, and vesicular trafficking, but its direct connection to aging hallmarks is not well-established for this specific protein. While PI(4,5)P2 sensing can feed into nutrient-sensing pathways (e.g., PI3K/TOR axis) or autophagy regulation, duc1's precise role in these aging-relevant cascades is not determinable from the available annotations alone. The generic "protein binding" annotation further limits mechanistic specificity. Without evidence linking duc1 to a defined pro- or anti-longevity pathway in yeast, a confident directional prediction cannot be made.

Key pathways
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate signalingmembrane lipid sensingvesicular trafficking
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model correctly identified duc1's role in PI(4,5)P2 binding/sensing but could not determine the directional longevity influence. The reasoning is cautious and acknowledges uncertainty, which is understandable given the limited functional annotations, but the model still failed to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about potential connections to TOR/autophagy pathways is speculative and not specifically tied to the anti-longevity classification. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than a confident wrong answer, but the prediction is still incorrect.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "duc1 encodes a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P2) binding and sensor protein in S. pombe. PI(4,5)P2 is a key signaling lipid involved in membrane dynamics, cytoskeletal organization, and vesicular trafficking, but its direct connection to aging hallmarks is not well-established for this specific protein. While PI(4,5)P2 sensing can feed into nutrient-sensing pathways (e.g., PI3K/TOR axis) or autophagy regulation, duc1's precise role in these aging-relevant cascades is not determinable from the available annotations alone. The generic \"protein binding\" annotation further limits mechanistic specificity. Without evidence linking duc1 to a defined pro- or anti-longevity pathway in yeast, a confident directional prediction cannot be made.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate signaling",
    "membrane lipid sensing",
    "vesicular trafficking"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "unclear",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model correctly identified duc1's role in PI(4,5)P2 binding/sensing but could not determine the directional longevity influence. The reasoning is cautious and acknowledges uncertainty, which is understandable given the limited functional annotations, but the model still failed to arrive at the correct answer. The mechanistic reasoning about potential connections to TOR/autophagy pathways is speculative and not specifically tied to the anti-longevity classification. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than a confident wrong answer, but the prediction is still incorrect.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}
duc1 · Schizosaccharomyces pombe | Aging biology eval