← Browse entries

SPS1

S. cerevisiae

putative serine/threonine protein kinase SPS1

What the model saw

Gene: SPS1
Organism: Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Known functions: putative serine/threonine protein kinase SPS1. ATP binding. protein kinase activity. protein serine kinase activity. protein serine/threonine kinase activity.
View unredacted entry
putative serine/threonine protein kinase SPS1. ATP binding. protein kinase activity. protein serine kinase activity. protein serine/threonine kinase activity.

Solver output

Predicted influence
Unclear
Confidence
35%
Mechanism
Deregulated nutrient sensing
Reasoning

SPS1 encodes a putative serine/threonine protein kinase in S. cerevisiae involved in sporulation and potentially in nutrient-sensing signaling cascades. Serine/threonine kinases can either promote or oppose longevity depending on their specific substrates and pathway context — for example, kinases in the TOR or RAS/PKA pathways tend to be anti-longevity, while kinases in stress-response or autophagy pathways tend to be pro-longevity. SPS1 is primarily characterized in the context of meiosis/sporulation rather than vegetative growth or canonical aging pathways, making its direct influence on longevity ambiguous. The available annotations (ATP binding, protein serine/threonine kinase activity) are too general to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role without knowledge of its specific substrates and signaling context in vegetative cells.

Key pathways
serine/threonine kinase signalingsporulation pathwaynutrient sensing
Longevity influence
Anti-longevity
Lifespan effect
Increase

GenAge curators classify each gene's normal function as promoting (Pro-Longevity) or opposing (Anti-Longevity) longevity, based on synthesis across studies. Loss-of-function effects can vary from this depending on the manipulation.

Advisor judgment

Answer
Incorrect
Mechanism
Incorrect
Reasoning quality
2/5
Failure mode
Appropriately uncertain
Notes

The model predicted "unclear" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is "anti_longevity." The model's reasoning is plausible given the limited information provided - SPS1 is indeed a serine/threonine kinase involved in sporulation, and the model correctly notes the ambiguity. However, the model failed to commit to the correct answer. The mechanism class of "deregulated_nutrient_sensing" is speculative and not well-supported. The model's uncertainty was somewhat appropriate given the sparse annotations, but it still missed the correct classification. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than confident wrong answer.

Raw API responses

solver

{
  "reasoning": "SPS1 encodes a putative serine/threonine protein kinase in S. cerevisiae involved in sporulation and potentially in nutrient-sensing signaling cascades. Serine/threonine kinases can either promote or oppose longevity depending on their specific substrates and pathway context — for example, kinases in the TOR or RAS/PKA pathways tend to be anti-longevity, while kinases in stress-response or autophagy pathways tend to be pro-longevity. SPS1 is primarily characterized in the context of meiosis/sporulation rather than vegetative growth or canonical aging pathways, making its direct influence on longevity ambiguous. The available annotations (ATP binding, protein serine/threonine kinase activity) are too general to confidently assign a pro- or anti-longevity role without knowledge of its specific substrates and signaling context in vegetative cells.",
  "confidence": 0.35,
  "key_pathways": [
    "serine/threonine kinase signaling",
    "sporulation pathway",
    "nutrient sensing"
  ],
  "mechanism_class": "deregulated_nutrient_sensing",
  "longevity_influence": "unclear"
}

advisor

{
  "notes": "The model predicted \"unclear\" with low confidence (0.35), while the ground truth is \"anti_longevity.\" The model's reasoning is plausible given the limited information provided - SPS1 is indeed a serine/threonine kinase involved in sporulation, and the model correctly notes the ambiguity. However, the model failed to commit to the correct answer. The mechanism class of \"deregulated_nutrient_sensing\" is speculative and not well-supported. The model's uncertainty was somewhat appropriate given the sparse annotations, but it still missed the correct classification. This is a case of appropriate uncertainty rather than confident wrong answer.",
  "failure_mode": "appropriately_uncertain",
  "answer_correct": false,
  "mechanism_correct": false,
  "reasoning_quality": 2,
  "ground_truth_questionable": false
}